The difference between living at home and living with a spouse free essay sample

The difference between living at home and living with a spouse If someone would have asked me at 17 years old if this is what I expected living on my own. I would have never imagined this is how it was going to be. Moving from my parents home and into my own place with my spouse was definitely a complete change as well as a challenge from what I was used to. I do not think that I could have prepared myself for how different it was really going to be. I went from everything being done for me, to having to make sure, I got everything done and thatI did not wait on someone else to do it for me. WOW! How different it was living at home and moving out with a spouse. The changes involved the house, rules, and memories. When we are still living at home with our parents we do not really think about how much the size and the location of a house will determine the price that you will end up paying for the property. We will write a custom essay sample on The difference between living at home and living with a spouse or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Once we move out, we start to realize even though we would love to have that big house with lots of land, which mainly we only want this to how off to our friends and family.It does not always come at a price we can afford. Once you become independent and start paying for these things on your own. You become more observant and start to look for homes that fall in your price range, based on what you can afford on the Income that you have coming In. And then we soon start to realize that even though the house may not be large, It Is still a place we can call our home and start to feel all warm and cozy. We should Just be thankful we can have a home .When we leave home It Is always seems to be a sad time In our lives Just because, we think about how many things has happened during the time we have been there and how leaving makes us feel Like It will all come to an end. Just remember those memories we will always keep with us no matter where we are In our life. Like the summers playing outside, the picnics In the field or maybe the water fights with siblings, most of all the holidays that your family all comes together and celebrates.The one good thing to always remember when we are living on our own, oh can start to create your own memories with your spouse. Whether It Is something completely crazy or something that Is very emotional this Is how you build your own memories. I think more now about all the things that we did growing up at home and that helps me determine how I want them to be now. The difference between living at home and living with a spouse By dreggier based on what you can afford on the income that you have coming in. And then we soon start to realize that even though the house may not be large, it is still a place weWhen we leave home it is always seems to be a sad time in our lives Just been there and how leaving makes us feel like it will all come to an end. Just remember those memories we will always keep with us no matter where we are in our life. Like the summers playing outside, the picnics in the field or maybe the water celebrates. The one good thing to always remember when we are living on our own, you can start to create your own memories with your spouse. Whether it is something completely crazy or something that is very emotional this is how you build

AP Capstone Essay Essay Example

AP Capstone Essay Essay Example AP Capstone Essay Essay AP Capstone Essay Essay In order for women to purchase clothe Eng, money was an element that separated wealthy fashions from poor fashions. William Norwich h, Times Style Entertaining editor, claims that the runners of New Works fluidity is cash, and the society of cash is fashion(Norwich 7). He believes that the way we talk about money is I n resemblance to how we talk about fashion. This statement is true for the 19th century where different fashions corresponded to how much money an individual has, however this perception n has changed over time Throughout the 19th century, people could easily identify whether an individual al strictly belonged in the upper, middle, or lower class based on their clothing; however re, overtime, women have gained the freedom to determine what clothing they want to we r despite their economic class. In the 1 9th century, wealthy people participated in balls, went to theatres, attended operas, enjoyed concerts, viewed horse races and art exhibitions, and went to luncheons. All these events differ in activity, however they all possess one similar classification on an elegant dress code. In order to be seen as being in the upper economic class, proper fashion attar IS a must. These were set social norms that people lived with, usually wealthy Poe peel. According to the Victorian Albert Museum, fashions worn by the wealthy reflected their I ivies and aspirations (V 1). This was their way of life and what people usually lived f or. Meaning that their life value depended on if they had access to appropriate clothing for the time period and had an ability to maintain inclusion in the upper economic class. This put a lot of pressure on women in this century, where they prepared for numerous hours for events t hat they were going to attend for an hour or so. This popular culture of elegant clothing for extra again events created a society where the amount of money defined whether an individual Was in the upper class or not. Careers such as dressmakers and tailors thrived since they been fitted tremendously from many wealthy men and women who required these services for their eve ready clothing. But what was fashion like for the middle class or lower class in the 1 9th cents woman who was poor in the 19th century maintained a sole purpose to survive e and provide for their families. Due to the lower classs consistent need to survive and work, fashions of the [1 9th] century were not practical for working women (Tussling 3). Women esp. NT all day constantly moving, and the extravagant dresses of the wealthy werent specific ally fit for high class women. Socially and economically, women of the lower class were display cede and this culture influenced women to wear fashions fit to their economic class. The luxuries of the wealthy were things that they desired, but they couldnt economically afford b cause the little money they made was focused on eating and paying important bills. Women I n the middle class however, possessed clothes similar to wealthy, but they werent usually as ext ravaging or the same elegant fabrics of the wealthy women. Overall, during the 19th century, fashions of extravagant dresses and elegant clothes resembled wealth while fashions of s implicitly and comfort resembled the middle class and poor. Today, in the 21st century, the wealthiest of Americans are either lawyers, physicians/ doctors, or married into the wealth ( NY Times 1). Of these wealthy American s, do they carry the legacy of the 1 9th century, where fashion symbolized their weal the? Overtime the definition of fashion has altered drastically. Many wealthy people of America t happily wear regular clothing through online shopping, thrift stores, or other common SSH popping locations such as Macys and etc (Adrian 6). The focus has shifted from traditions Of lee gang and extravagant clothing for simple events such as horse races and luncheons, an d has shifted to rather simple clothing (usually composed of Theists and jeans) to basketball g Ames, sporting events, or other common activities. In todays century, fashion has rather beck mom more of an art rather than an outlet for wealthy, rich people. More wealthy people that are I n the top 1 percent of America usually are focused on their careers and making money. For exam peel, the Dallas Mavericks owner, Mark Cuban, wears a simple Mavericks This that supports is team and jeans on a daily basis, but he owns a 765 million dollar basketball team gyms bobbling his extreme wealth ( ESP. News Services 2). His fashion is similar to an average A American Mavericks fan. The only thing that separates Mark Cuban from the average A American is his ownership of a multimillion dollar basketball team. Rather than fashion reflect ting ones wealth, like in the 19th century,currently people in the lower or middle class can wear clothes that resemble clothes Of the wealthy, while people who are wealthy can wear clot hinge that one would identify as middle or lower class. This differs the 19th century where this free doom of choosing how clothing reflects ones economic level wasnt present. However an individual al sets themselves out to be, essentially establishes economically where they stand including the choices they make in life good or bad. Whereas in the 1 9th century if you were born p or, you were usually stuck poor; however, in the 21st century, if you are born poor, but word k hard to gain a quality education and apply certain aspirations in life, qualifies one to establish h themselves anywhere in the economic hierarchy whether its upper, middle, or lower class So the question is, what changes have occurred over time? Well, during the 19 the century, the amount of or lack of money defined who and where you were in society s socially and economically. Wealthy people are all over America, but sometime we wouldnt be able to spot the difference from an extremely wealthy American to a normal, average Name Rican just by looking at the type of clothing they wear. Also someone who flak nuts wealthy c looting/fashions isnt essentially as wealthy as they appear to be. Now currently in the 21st Cent turn, the century of change and innovation, has shifted from traditional norms to more opening d and intuitive thinking. Many people find very nice and presentable clothing from simple pal sec such as thrift stores and other name brands that arent as expensive. Our society has become me less vain and has began to focus on ways to express themselves through clothing based on per sonar preferences, In contrast to previous times, where your fashion solely defined who you are. D urinating 19th century, fashion dominated wealth, however in the 21st century, despite echo ionic level, one can dictate their fashion style. Fashion has become a way of one expressing them selves, as theyre re many different styles (hobo, nerd, memo, gothic, preppy, etc. In comparison n to the 19th century where there was one traditional style. As Coco Channel stated, and hi chi still lingers on today is that, fashion changes, but style endures. The main focus of the research was to effectively provide information on ha t caused and initiated the change of womens fashion over time throughout the 19th c entry in comparison to the 21st century. Initially, I believed that money didnt affect fashion any did fervently than it did in the 19th century versus now. After approaching and reviewing the con mimic classes of the 19th century and its effect on womens clothing my perception about women s fashion and its connection with money changed. Throughout the 1 9th century, there was a h age divide between the have and the havent. This illustration of the have and havent was high helmeted through the wealthy ability to possess extreme amounts of luxury items and the ability t o travel and enjoy life worry free. The wealthy were also well clothed to an extreme, so there WA s an undeniable and obvious difference in the fashion of the upper class and the working class women. With that Egan to realize that money was a tool in determining where one stood con amicably in the 19th century whereas in the 21 SST century this establishment of economic class sees based on fashion was more liberal and varied. When writing at first, I solely focused the simple connection between money and fashion. I failed input multiple perspectives and view nuts that all contribute to an argument. Was simply stating information that I learned and not essentially presenting an argument. Not only did this make me have to reevaluate what I was communicating but it was also a huge learning experience in understanding how to draw injections between outside viewpoints. Varied viewpoints werent the only t hinge that changed my initial views of fashion overtime, but diverging opinions such as crediting t genealogical advances for the widespread liberal like feeling and freedom of clothing for w omen often emerged. This may have helped produce an abundance in the amounts of cool thing in society, however this is not the main and sole reason of why women began to wear a variety of clothing. With social movements such as the Womens Rights Movement and the wide parade popularity of affordable thrift shopping enhanced and allowed women of all socioeconomic ICC classes to wear what they desired. This diverging opinion helped enrich my opinion and Reese rich, and made me think of our research problem thoroughly because it opened my viewpoint to different lenses and realize how fashion effected all sorts of political, scientific, social, ethical, con mimic,and other perspectives that Ive previously didnt consider in researching. With looking a t historical museums, such as the Victorian and Albert Museum, that described the con mimic divide between classes to observing how individuals with power and influence shape how we think of fast ion assisted in learning how fashion changed. By selecting evidence that truly sup ported my claim, analyzing and evaluating this evidence, and understanding the context and the e argument, I realized how fashion was much bigger than just a simple piece of decorated material. With all the new perspectives, diverging opinions, and new discoveries , was able to conduct research on the factors that attributed to the change of fashion overt mime. Our group decided to approach the research question by picking different lenses that woo old deem to be necessary in truly understanding the effects of fashion overtime. Our group c NC duded that the historical, ethical, religious, social, and economic lenses accurately establish a well structured argument. The difficult part of this component was ensuring that throughout our research that we were essentially on the same page throughout the entirety of the project. Co mining together our group decided to write our theses and a main idea of our topic in order to all effectively understand what was going on throughout the research. This was an effective choice because was able to understand fully the whole idea of the project which assisted in la term creating a thesis for our group paper. We came up with a thesis that covered all of our claims under three main points. The steps taken throughout the research were all focused in ensuring that the group continued to cohesively be on one page. Overall, I was satisfied in the way our group worked together in order to understand the effects on fashion. This procedure of eke ping in mind to be on the same page helped our research, analysis and presentation to be executed in a preserve manner.

Advantage to the use of tasers by law enforcement officials Essay

Advantage to the use of tasers by law enforcement officials - Essay Example As Hemenway and Weil explain, â€Å"guns in the United States currently exact a terrible toll: over 1,500 accidental deaths per year, close to 12,000 homicides and more than 17,000 suicides† (94). In other words, apart from the deliberate use of guns in the commission of crimes, guns are responsible for thousands and thousands of preventable deaths per year. Despite this, however, the very notion of banning firearms is unrealistic. The American public believes that it has an inalienable right to bear arms for the purposes of self-defence and, given Constitutional provisions supporting this right, it is unrealistic to assume that any gun ban proposal will ever successfully pass into federal legislature and be effectively implemented (Hemenway and Weil, 94-96). Added to that, if law enforcement officials are to effectively fight the crime pandemic, they must be armed. The situation, as described, presents policy makers and law enforcement with a paradox. Our nation’s crime rates are soaring. A Department of Justice publication reports that almost 1,500,000 million violent crimes were committed in 2005 (FBI, 2006). Approximately one million and a half murders, rapes and armed robberies were committed across the United States in a single year. Not only does this figure evidence the extent to which crime has reached pandemic proportions in the country but underscores the nature of the on-the-job dangers which law enforcement officers confront every singe day. To confront the crime pandemic, law enforcement officers must